![]() the director is ingredient who somehow makes it all work, whether they have accurate looking tanks or not is to still make the audience believe what they're seeing despite the handicap. that's why most amateur films areĬrap (i don't mean the few that actually make it to theatres), because no matter what the script, you're going to see directors that don't know what they're doing or don't have any resources. In the initial attack the Germans had an almost two-to-one advantage in manpower and for the first time on the Western Front outnumbered the Allies in terms of tanks and other armored vehicles.The directing is mostly the end all be all- a good director can make what theoretically looks like an ordinary script interesting, on the other hand, a great script can be ruined with bad directing. It was a good time to take a break, and then you had a huge blizzard."īy contrast, the Germans were very prepared and had amassed more than 400,000 men, and just over 1,400 armored vehicles including tanks, tank destroyers and assault guns. They (the Americans) were out of food, ammunition and gasoline. ![]() But from the American perspective, the Germans were going to be defeated – it was just that the Allies' supply lines couldn't keep up. "It was in many ways a colossal failure of intelligence, and the Allies misread the tea leaves. "There was a certain amount of hubris involved," Ulbrich added. ![]() Ulbrich, program director and associate professor in the Master of Arts in History and in Military History at Norwich University in Vermont, told Fox News. "If you look at where the Allies were – after fighting through the hedgerows of Normandy and racing across France, to them the Germans looked bloodied and beaten," David J. ![]() 6, 1945 file photo, American tanks wait on the snowy slopes in Bastogne, Belgium during the Battle of the Bulge. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |